[Previous] [Next] [Index]
[Thread]
RE: DOJ?
Vandals on justice dept. Web site
BY JOHN O'NEIL
New York Times
WASHINGTON -- A computer hacker vandalized the home page of the
Department of Justice Friday night, posting obscenities and
anti-government graffiti, a department official said Saturday.
The Justice Department's site on the World Wide Web was shut down
early Saturday after members of the public called to report the
electronic break-in, said a department spokesman, Joe Krovisky. The
site will remain shut while the department's technical experts assess
its security, he said.
Krovisky said that the system the hacker broke into was separate from
the department's internal computer system, which contains highly
sensitive information about criminal cases and investigations.
``There's no way that the internal department information could have
been affected'' by a hacker who gained access to the information
presented on the web site, he said. ``That would have been
impossible.''
The hacker replaced information on the home page with obscenities,
graffiti and anti-government statements, he said, but declined to give
details.
The Associated Press reported that the site was changed to read
``United States Department of Injustice,'' next to a red, black and
white flag bearing a swastika. The text of the page was written over a
background of gray swastikas, and at the top declared in red letters:
``This page is in violation of the Communications Decency Act.''
The page included color pictures of George Washington, Adolf Hitler,
who is called the attorney general, and a topless Jennifer Aniston,
one of the stars of NBC's ``Friends,'' the Associated Press said.
Other sexually explicit images were shown.
Hackers used the majority of the web site to criticize the
Communication Decency Act, signed in February, which makes
transmitting sexually explicit material in ways children might see it
a felony, punishable by up to two years in prison and a $250,000
fine.
Two special panels of federal judges, one in Philadelphia and another
in New York, have declared the act unconstitutional because it
violates First Amendment rights of free expression.
NYT-08-17-96 1736EDT
----------
From: John Lehmann (SSASyd)[SMTP:LEHMANNJ@saatchi.com.au]
Subject: RE: DOJ?
Some of us on the list have no lives and don't get to watch the
news... please post a summary :)
I enjoy lurking on this group, and had expected to see several
messages this morning regarding the national news last night, but
alas: What happened to the DOJ over the weekend?